10 thoughts on “Surreality, Population Me

  1. Owldaughter Post author

    Me neither. In fact, I’d never heard the term, ever, in the decade+ I’ve worked and read and networked. But it takes all kinds and various terms sometimes are regional, too.

  2. Blade

    Never heard the term either. Interesting, but never heard of it. I think I take more offence to how the article implies that all solitaries are fluffy bunnies.

  3. Owldaughter Post author

    The whiff of “solitaries aren’t serious” comes from the poorly-written aspect of the article. Either that, or it was written by a dyed-in-the-wool formal Trad person who firmly believes that you have to be a member of an officially recognised coven to be Wiccan.

  4. Owldaughter Post author

    I already started — namely, by fixing the Cunningham dates and adding the first edition info to the Starhawk citation. I’m not just going to rewrite the ntry without careful thought and composition offline, though.

  5. Talyesin

    Ceri – wouldn’t that be frowned upon, like you mentioned in my post about creating a Squirrelman entry?

    I realize they’re different – Arin wouldn’t be editting an entry on herself, on on her book.

    Hey, I know. Someone I know start a Squirrelman entry, and I’ll go an edit it! *LOL*

  6. Ceri

    As you say — you’re comparing apples and oranges. The entry isn’t about Arin, or her book. It’s about solitary Wicca as a general subject, which I think Arin qualifies as an “expert” in (insofar as solitary Wicca can have anything resembling an “expert”).


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *